The US naval farce: Oil not drugs in the Caribbean

 


By: Ricardo Abud

The U.S. Navy is conducting one of the most expensive and strategically absurd operations in modern history. Under the guise of combating drug trafficking, the U.S. is spending billions of dollars of taxpayer money on a mission that any drug expert knows is fundamentally pointless. 

The reality is brutally simple: the fentanyl, cocaine, heroin, and other drugs flooding the United States come primarily from Mexico and the Pacific Rim, produced and transported by the Sinaloa and Jalisco Nueva Generación cartels, not Venezuela.

Venezuela neither produces fentanyl nor is it a producer of cocaine for the US market. Nor is it a route for drug trafficking to the US. Most fentanyl and other substances enter through legal ports on the border with Mexico, while cocaine arrives primarily through Colombian Pacific routes to Mexico and from there to the United States. So why does the US spend a fortune patrolling Venezuelan waters?

The answer lies not in clandestine laboratories, but in oil wells. Venezuela possesses the world's largest proven oil reserves, and the United States wants them. The naval deployment is not an anti-drug operation; it is military preparation for regime change.

The U.S. naval budget for 2025 is estimated at $257.6 billion, with an average of $40 billion annually in naval construction through 2054. Each day an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer patrols the Caribbean costs approximately $200,000 in operations, fuel, and personnel. Multiplying this by the deployed fleet, we're talking millions of dollars a day for a mission that makes no sense from a counternarcotics perspective.

Meanwhile, fentanyl and cocaine continue to flow en masse across the Mexican border and Pacific routes, causing more than 70,000 overdose deaths annually and fueling the addiction of millions more. Resources spent patrolling waters that don't transport drugs to the U.S. could fund treatment programs, rehabilitation centers, and actual border operations, right where the real trafficking occurs.

The Mexican cartels of Sinaloa and Jalisco New Generation are responsible for the drug crisis in the United States. They control approximately 90% of fentanyl trafficking and much of the cocaine that reaches the United States. The main routes are concentrated on the Pacific coast: cocaine shipments leave Colombia, travel by sea to Mexico, and are then distributed to the United States.

Fentanyl's chemical precursors arrive primarily from Asia to Mexico, where cartels process and transport the drug. Traffickers use underground tunnels, modified vehicles, drones, and go-fast boats to cross the Mexican border and transport drugs along the Pacific coast. Venezuela simply isn't part of these supply chains. If the United States truly wanted to combat drugs, it would concentrate its resources on the southern border with Mexico and interdicting Pacific routes, not in Caribbean waters, which are marginal to the U.S. drug problem.

Venezuela has approximately 300 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, the largest in the world. The United States has imposed 25% tariffs on countries that import Venezuelan crude, reimposed oil sanctions multiple times, and used every pretext to justify its economic isolation.

The refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast are particularly suited to processing Venezuelan heavy crude, making it especially valuable to the U.S. oil industry. Control of these resources would represent enormous geopolitical and economic advantages. The naval deployment is not accidental; it is preparing the ground for an intervention that would allow the installation of a government favorable to U.S. oil interests.

While US politicians spend billions on this naval enigma, American families suffer the real consequences. Taxpayers, like a teacher in Ohio or a nurse in Houston, pay taxes that fund every gallon of naval fuel spent in Venezuelan waters, while their own families lack resources for education or medicine. Military families also suffer; one wife in Ohio hasn't seen her naval husband for months. 

He is patrolling waters that don't carry the drugs that are killing his neighbors. Her husband is "protecting" the U.S. from a nonexistent threat in the Caribbean, while fentanyl and cocaine flow freely across the Mexican border. The sailors, risking their lives for a pointless mission, are separated from their families to serve in an operation that isn't fighting drugs, but rather preparing an oil intervention. For every day the U.S. Navy uselessly patrols the Caribbean, the U.S. could fund 500 additional agents on the Mexican border, build ten addiction treatment centers, or equip 50 hospitals with naloxone antidotes. 

Instead, the government prefers to position military assets for future seizure of oil resources. This is a strategic contradiction that only makes sense if the real objective is not drugs, but oil. The Trump administration designated Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, but naval assets are concentrated in Venezuela.

The only beneficiaries of this charade are the defense contractors selling naval systems, the oil companies hoping for access to Venezuelan crude, and the politicians using drug fears to justify military spending. The losers are clear: the American taxpayers who fund a lie, the families who lose loved ones to fentanyl and cocaine while resources are wasted, and the military personnel who risk their lives on a dishonest mission.

American citizens deserve to know that their taxes are not saving lives from addiction, but rather funding preparations for another oil war. This is one of the most costly and cynical lies in the history of American foreign policy, paid for with the money and blood of those who can least afford it.

THERE IS NOTHING MORE EXCLUSIVE THAN BEING POOR

Publicar un comentario

0 Comentarios